/b/ - Random

The random board

Mode: Reply
Name
Options
Subject
Message

Max message length: 4096

Files

Max file size: 100.00 MB

Max files: 5

Password

(Used to delete files and posts)

Misc

Remember to follow the rules


Error 404: Snow not found

[Index] [Catalog] [Bottom] [Refresh]

Anonymous 09/05/2020 (Sat) 05:45:30 No. 14922
Now for the world to be as woke as California is. Time to normalize pedophilia
(1.03 MB 679x956 Clipboard.png)
Image didn't post?
There was a caller on Rush Limbaugh yesterday that brought this up. As I understand it (I wasn't really listen too much), it's to bring the laws for straight and gay sex in line. In the past, sexual activity typical of straights with regard to minors was punished at a less intensity than that typical of gays.
https://leadstories.com/hoax-alert/2020/09/fact-check-california-did-not-pass-a-pro-pedophilia-bill.html > Did California pass a "pro pedophilia bill?" No, that's not true. A meme claims California Senate Bill 145 passed in a 6-2 vote and "no registration or felony if sex with minor is w/in 10 years." The bill is intended to protect LGBTQ+ minors from discriminatory laws, not to be "pro pedophilia." The new law allows judges to use their discretion to place people on the sex offender registry if they are convicted of having un-forced oral or anal sex with a minor 14-17, and are within a 10 year age range. Judges previously only had this discretion if the unforced sex act was penile and vaginal. See also: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/09/03/fact-check-california-law-does-not-decriminalize-sex-minors/3456171001/ >>14924 > straight and gay sex Plenty of heterosexuals engage in oral and anal erotic activities as well.
>>14923 priceless
>>14925 >The new law allows judges to use their discretion to place people on the sex offender registry if they are convicted of having un-forced oral or anal sex with a minor 14-17, and are within a 10 year age range. Judges previously only had this discretion if the unforced sex act was penile and vaginal. How is this supposed to protect gay children? and from what "discriminatory laws"? I don't get it.
>>14931 In blue states, "protect" is defined as "give a disproportionate amount of destructive power." Just like how vague and subjective sexual harassment laws are more about giving feminist bigots the power to arbitrarily destroy a man's career then they are about protecting victims of actual sexual assault.
(375.72 KB 2000x2000 beach.jpg)
Welcome to Lolifornia! = the cunny state =
What strange times to be alive, never thought I'd see actual pedophilia legalized in my lifetime.
>>14939 It hasn't been. California's bill is about giving judges greater discretion for placing someone a sex offender registry.
>>14941 *placing someone on
The right to bare lolis shall not be infringed!
>>14936 Ever heard that song, Lolifornication?
(63.90 KB 630x630 lole.jpg)
>>14952 >right to bare lolis I see what you did there.
>>14952 funne
>>14922 End yourself pedonigger
(15.82 KB 428x241 deep in thought.jpg)
>>16778 >tfw the thread had already ended itself before you rezzed it two months later
(168.34 KB 1060x1500 loli1696.jpg)
Thread is alive! Post lolis!
(72.07 KB 771x510 cunny school.jpg)
>>16780 Did you attend CUNNY?
(83.48 KB 525x697 woah.jpg)
>>16786 How to get accepted at cunny.edu?
(87.11 KB 968x769 conversation-stop.jpg)
>>16816 That girl wants it.


Delete
Report

no cookies?